Gender's Perception: Does the rain noise generated underneath metal deck roof system affects occupants comfort?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Occupants' perception towards the value of indoor environment has always been a crucial issue. Having a good quality in an indoor environment influences the way occupants' behave in their daily activities. Moreover, there are differences on the gender perspective on how they perceive the value of indoor environment. However, gender perception towards rain noise effects in relation to students' activities has been overlooked until today. From the findings it can convey beneficial information regarding the quality of life towards students' living. Conclusively, the overall finding reveals those female students are more annoyed compared to the opposite gender.
Article Details
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Muhammad Fahmi Md Idris, Seti Mariam Ayop
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Andy, M. “Virtual Acoustic Prototype technique applied to the simulation of noise from rainfall on skylights,”in 19th International Congress on Acoustics Madrid, 2007, pages 1-6.
Amole, D. (2009). Residential satisfaction in students' housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 76-85.
Bronzaft. A,L, and Hangler. L, (2012). Noise: The Invisible Pollutant that cannot be ignored: Emerging Environmental Technologies Vol.II. Earth and Environmental Science, Pages 75-96.
Carter. C,G, Villot. M, and Horlaville.C, (2002) Study of Simulated Rainfall Noise on Roofs and Glazings. Prof Forum Acusticum, Sevilla.
Diener, Ed and Eunkook M. Suh (1997). ‘Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators.’ Social Indicators Research, 40 (1-2), 189-216.
Dahlan, N., Jones, P, & Alexander, D. (2011). Operative temperature and thermal sensation assessments in non-air-conditioned multi storey hostels in Malaysia,” Building and Environment, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 457- 467.
H.Suga and H. Tachibana (1994). Sound radiation characteristics of lightweight roof constructions excited by rain. Journal of building Acoustic, 1(4), pages 249-270.
Hunter, M.D, Phang, S.Y., Lee,K.H. and Woodruff, P.W.R. (2005), Gender-specific sensitivity to low frequencies in male speech. Neuroscience Letters 375, pg148–150.
K.O. Kadiri and J. Okosun (2006). The Performance in Building Without Shading Devices. Journal of Applied Sciences 6(6) 1404-1048.
Kin-Che Lam, Pak-Kin Chan, Tin Cheung Chan, Wai-Hong Au and Wing-Chi Hui (2009) Annoyance response to mixed transportation noise in Hong Kong. Applied Acoustic 70 ; 1-10.
Lee Yuk Choi, “A Study on simulated rainfall noise generated and prediction of rain noise for composite rood constructions,” (Master thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2004).
Idris, M.F.M., Musa, M.M., and Ayop, S.M (2012). Noise Generated by Raindrop on Metal Deck Roof Profiles: It’s Effect towards People Activities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 36, pg 485 – 492.
Nurul ‘Ulyani, M. N., Nor’ Aini, Y., & Nazirah, Z. A. (2011). The Influence of Socio-Economic Backgrounds towards Satisfaction with Student Housing Facilities. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 58.
Pearson, K., Bennet, R., & Fidell, S. (1977). Speech Levels in Various Environments. EPA-600/1-77-025. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C.
Shulamith Koening “Human Right Leaning A People’s Report” The People’s Movement for Human Right Education, PDRE report, 382, 2006.
Thomsen, J. (2008). Student Housing – Student Homes? Aspects of Student Housing Satisfaction. PhD, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Trondheim, Norway.
Taylor, S.M. (1984). A path model of aircraft noise annoyance. Journal of Sound and Vibration 96, 24J-260
Whether Report, the Department of Metrological, Malaysia (June 2010)
Warring R.H. (1983). Handbook of Noise and Vibration Control 5th Edition. England : Trade & Technical Press Limited.
Zimmer, K. & Ellermeier, W. (1999). Psychometric properties of four measures of noise sensitivity: a comparison. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 295-302.