Household Recycling Behaviours and Attitudes toward Waste Bank Project: Mahasarakham Municipality

Main Article Content

Wichitra Singhirunnusorn
Kidanun Donlakorn
Warapon Kaewhanin

Abstract

This study investigated factors influencing household recycling behaviour and the possibility of household participation in a community-based recycling bank project. The research examines two communities in Mahasarakham  municipality, where there are differences in conditions and waste recycling management. The study demonstrated that demographic attributes and socio-economic factors play a little role in waste separation and recycling behaviour at household level. Meanwhile, environmental knowledge and attitudes contribute to the perceptions of people, their awareness, and participation to the community-based recycling project. Participation process was usually lacking in the project planning procedure and did not contribute enough time and resource to educate participants.

Article Details

How to Cite
Singhirunnusorn, W., Donlakorn, K., & Kaewhanin, W. (2017). Household Recycling Behaviours and Attitudes toward Waste Bank Project: Mahasarakham Municipality. Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies, 2(5), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v2i5.215

References

Visvanathan, C. (2006) Environmentally sound waste management in Asia. In the Asia 3R-Conference, 30 October -1 November, 2006 Tokyo JAPAN.

Singhirunnusorn, W. and Sahachaisaree, N. (2008) The impact of solid waste recycling process on the livelihood of urban informal economy: a case study in Bangkok. Waste-The Social Context (2008), pX1-X12.

Kladnuenklum K. (2003) Waste recycling bank at Ruam Kan Saeng Community. Special project study, Master Program in Public Administration, Burapha University, Thailand.

Nixon, H. and Saphores, J.M. (2009) Information and the decision to recycle: results from a survey of US households, J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 52 (2009), pp. 257–277.

Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., and Livi, S. (2004) Recycling: planned and self- expressive behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24 (2004), pp. 227–236.