Intervention Program to Change the Pro-environmental Behavior of the Riverside Community
Main Article Content
Abstract
The riverside communities devised a community-based program to negotiate with the local government to avoid eviction. As an intervention package,-which aims to upgrade the living environment and increase the residents' pro-environmental behaviour-, this program consists of organization and information, combined with social interaction, commitment and feedback performance. Intensive observations were used to examine the effectiveness of the program to environmental behaviour change and upgrading settlement. The findings reveal that having a common objective of renovation is the most influential variable in motivating individuals to increase environmentally friendly behaviour on the upgrading environment.
Article Details
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Joyce Marcella Laurens
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Aytulkasapoglu, M. & Ecevit Mehmet, C. (2002) Attitudes and behavior toward the environment. Environment and Behavior 34,363, http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi.content/abstract1/34/3/363
Black, J.S., Stern, P.C. & Elworth, J.T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on householdenergy adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 3-21.
Corraliza, Joze A. Berenguer, Jaime (2000). Environmental values, beliefs and actions: a situational approach. Environment and Behavior 32, 832, http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi.content/abstract1/32/3/832.
De Young, R. (1993). Changing behavioral and making it stick. The conceptualization and management of conservation and competence motivation. Environment and Behavior, 28, 358.
Dolnicar, Sara & Grun, Bettina (2009). Environmentally friendly behavior: Can heterogeneity among individuals and contexts/environments be harvested for improved sustainable management? Environment and Behavior 41, 693, http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi.content/abstract41/5/693.
Dwyer, W., Leeming, F.C., Cobern, M.K., Porter, B.E. & Jackson, J.M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980. Environment and Behavior, 25, 275.
Geller, E.S. (1990). Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Where have all the flowers gone? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 269.
Groot, Judith I .M. & Steg, Linda (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior. how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior 10,330, http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi.content/abstract10/3/330.
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R. & Tomera, A. N. (1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1-8.
Hopper J.R. & Nielsen J.M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior. Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in community recycling program. Environment and Behavior 23, 195.
Oskamp, S. et al. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23, 494.
Paguyuban Warga Strenkali Surabaya (2004). Data-data Kampung Strenkali Surabaya (unpublished research).
Pollet, Fabien. (2005). Affordance and design. Mind, Language and Cognitive Science.
Seamon, David (1982). The Phenomenological contribution to environmental psychology. London: Academic Press.
Staats, Henk, Harland, Paul & Wilke, Henk (2004). Effecting durable change. A Team approach to improve environmental behavior in the household. Environment and Behavior 3, 341, http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi.content/abstract36/3/341
Struder, Raymond. (1970). The dynamics of behavior-contingent physical systems. In Harold Prohansky et al., eds., Environmental Psychology: man and his Physical Setting. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, pp. 56-75.
Tipper, Steven P., Paul, Matthew A. & Hayes, Amy E. (2006). Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3): 493-498.